Real-world comparison of terlipressin vs. octreotide as an adjuvant treatment in the management of variceal bleeding.

Variceal bleeding is a major complication and the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of terlipressin vs octreotide as an adjuvant to endoscopic management of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding in a real-time scenario. We reviewed the medical records of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding from January 2005 to December 2020 at our tertiary care Aga Khan University Hospital. Mortality was assessed after 6 weeks. A total of 842 patients with variceal bleed were evaluated. 624 patients (74.1%) and 218 patients (25.9%) received Terlipressin and Octreotide respectively. On multiple regression analysis, cardiac events during hospital stay (OR: 11.22), presence of Porto-systemic encephalopathy (OR: 3.79), and elevated bilirubin levels at the time of presentation were found to be independent risk factors for increased six weeks mortality. Moreover, cardiac events during hospital stay (OR: 3.26), Porto-systemic encephalopathy at presentation (OR: 3.06), and octreotide administration (OR: 1.80) were identified as independent risk factors for increased length of hospital stay. Terlipressin and Octreotide have similar outcomes in terms of control of bleeding, hospital stay, mortality, and side effects when used as adjuvant therapy for the management of variceal bleeding.

Extravasation After [ 177 Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE Therapy.

ABSTRACT: Extravasation of the radiopharmaceutical during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy infusion is an unwanted infrequently reported event. We present the case of a 74-year old woman with a neuroendocrine tumor who was referred for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. During intravenous infusion of 7.4 GBq [ 177 Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in the upper right arm, extravasation of the radiopharmaceutical occurred through a displaced intravenous catheter. Planar scintigraphy showed pooling of radioactivity in the right upper arm. After 24 hours, the swelling in the arm was decreased; however, erythema was increased. One week later, symptoms had disappeared, and the patient did not experience any complications during follow-up of 11 months.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist Versus Agonist for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Therapy-Resistant Meningioma: PROMENADE Phase 0 Study.

Our primary aim was to compare the therapeutic index (tumor-to-bone marrow and tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratios) of the new radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 with the established radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in the same patients with progressive, standard therapy-refractory meningioma. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, open-label phase 0 study (NCT04997317), 6 consecutive patients were included: 3 men and 3 women (mean age, 63.5 y). Patients received 6.9-7.3 GBq (standard injected radioactivity) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC followed by 3.3-4.9 GBq (2 GBq/m2 × body surface area) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 at an interval of 10 ± 1 wk. In total, 1 [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 2-3 [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 treatment cycles were performed. Quantitative SPECT/CT was done at approximately 24, 48, and 168 h after injection of both radiopharmaceuticals to calculate meningioma and organ absorbed doses as well as tumor-to-organ absorbed-dose ratios (3-dimensional segmentation approach for meningioma, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, and spleen). Results: The median of the meningioma absorbed dose of 1 treatment cycle was 3.4 Gy (range, 0.8-10.2 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 11.5 Gy (range, 4.7-22.7 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. The median bone marrow and kidney absorbed doses after 1 treatment cycle were 0.11 Gy (range, 0.05-0.17 Gy) and 2.7 Gy (range, 1.3-5.3 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 0.29 Gy (range, 0.16-0.39 Gy) and 3.3 Gy (range, 1.6-5.9 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, resulting in a 1.4 (range, 0.9-1.9) times higher median tumor-to-bone marrow absorbed-dose ratio and a 2.9 (range, 2.0-4.8) times higher median tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratio with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, 2 patients developed reversible grade 2 lymphopenia after 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. Afterward, 2 patients developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and 1 patient developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and neutropenia after 2-3 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed at 15 mo or more after the start of therapy. The disease control rate was 83% (95% CI, 53%-100%) at 12 mo or more after inclusion. Conclusion: Treatment with 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 showed 2.2-5.7 times higher meningioma absorbed doses and a favorable therapeutic index compared with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC after injection of 1.4-2.1 times lower activities. The first efficacy results demonstrated a high disease control rate with an acceptable safety profile in the standard therapy for refractory meningioma patients. Therefore, larger studies with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 are warranted in meningioma patients.

Octreotide for long-lasting malignant bowel obstruction: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of the combination of octreotide and other drugs for the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) has been well described. However, long-lasting stages with lack of stool emission are a challenging clinical condition of MBO that have never described. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe two cases in which the addition of octreotide to supportive care measures, even given late after more than 3 weeks of no stool emission, resulted to be still effective in recovering the bowel transit. In the first case, a patient admitted to home palliative care had a nasogastric tube and reported to not have stool emission and passing gas for 25 days. Two days after starting the combination of octreotide and other drugs, the patient evacuated and the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting nausea or episodes of vomiting. In the second case, a patient admitted to an acute palliative care unit, the patient had no stool emission for more than 3 weeks. A nasogastric tube was placed and comprehensive palliative care treatment was provided. Two days after starting a combination of octreotide and other drugs, the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting vomiting. In both cases, bowel transit recovered and patients were able to initiate oral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of octreotide with other drugs described for standard treatment for the management of MBO, should be attempted even in patients with very long periods of lack of feces emission.

Methodology of the SORENTO clinical trial: a prospective, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of high exposure octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) in patients with GEP-NET.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care (SoC) for the initial treatment of unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) requires initiation of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy, octreotide and lanreotide, which provide safe and efficacious tumour/symptom control in most patients. However, disease progression can occur with SoC SRL treatment and the optimal dose response of SRL remains unknown. Octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) is a novel, long-acting, high-exposure formulation that has shown greater bioavailability and improved administration than octreotide long-acting release (LAR) with a well-tolerated safety profile. Retrospective data have highlighted a potential benefit of high-exposure SRL for improved disease control in patients who did not adequately respond to the current SoC SRL treatment. This trial will investigate the efficacy and tolerability of CAM2029 compared to the current SoC, including octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel (ATG). METHODS: SORENTO is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label phase 3 trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of treatment with 20 mg octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) every 2 weeks (Q2W) compared to treatment with the Investigator's choice of SRL therapy at standard doses for tumour control (octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) in approximately 300 patients with unresectable/metastatic and well-differentiated GEP-NET. Upon confirmation of disease progression (determined by a Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC] and defined as per RECIST 1.1), patients may enter an open-label extension treatment period with once weekly dosing, to investigate the effects of higher frequency dosing. Overall survival follow-up will end a maximum of 2 years after primary analysis. The primary endpoint will be analysed after 194 confirmed PFS events. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial investigating the efficacy of CAM2029 versus SoC SRL therapy using a head-to-head, superiority trial design. It is expected to be the first trial to investigate the efficacy of increased dosing frequency of a high-exposure SRL. A BIRC will limit bias and measurement variability and ensure high-quality efficacy data. Additionally, inclusion of patients with well-differentiated Grade 3 NET may elucidate treatment strategies for this rarely investigated patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05050942. Registered on 21st September 2021.

Outcome on Mesenteric Mass Response of Small-Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: The MesenLuth Study, a National Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors and Endocan-RENATEN Network.

A mesenteric mass (MM), characterized by fibrotic reaction, is present in most small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs). 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown its efficacy in patients with progressive SI-NETs. However, because of specific tissue characteristics of desmoplastic MMs, we hypothesize that these lesions may be refractory to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. Methods: From the national French Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines database, we identified patients with an advanced SI-NET and a MM (≥2 cm with a retractile aspect) of a SI-NET treated by at least 1 course of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. The primary endpoint was a MM objective response rate (ORR) of less than 5%. Secondary endpoints were metabolic response, MM-related safety, and clinical response, as well as MM progression-free survival (PFS) and non-MM PFS. Results: In total, 52 patients were included. The MM ORR was 4% (n = 2), and the non-MM ORR was 8% (n = 4). No patient had a MM metabolic response, and the non-MM metabolic response rate was 12% (n = 6). Among the 26 patients with baseline MM-related symptoms, 46% had a clinical response. Four patients presented with gastrointestinal complications during PRRT. The median MM-related PFS was not reached, and the non-MM PFS was 50.3 mo (95% CI, 38.2-61.7 mo). Conclusion: This study confirms that 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT does not lead to morphologic response on MMs (ORR < 5%). However, it allows MM stability, with few MM-related side effects, and has a relevant impact on MM-related symptoms.

Long-term Nephrotoxicity after PRRT: Myth or Reality.

Rationale: The kidneys are commonly considered as the potential dose-limiting organ for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), making the risk of nephrotoxicity a primary concern. This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation and long-term follow-up aims to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity after PRRT in a large cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated at our institution over the past 18 years. Methods: A total of 1361 NEN patients treated with 1-10 cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, 90Y-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, DUO-PRRT (sequential administration of 90Y- and 177Lu-), or TANDEM-PRRT (combination of 90Y- and 177Lu- on the same day concomitantly) were included in this analysis. All parameters were prospectively documented in a structured database comprising over 250 items per patient and retrospectively analyzed. Kidney function, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cGFR, and electrolytes, was evaluated before each PRRT cycle and during follow-up. Restaging was regularly performed at 6-month intervals until death. Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.5.0). Results: Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 5409 cycles of PRRT were administered to 1361 NEN patients. Follow-up after complete treatment was available for 1281 patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT, with a median follow-up time of 69.2 months (interquartile range, 32.8-110.5 months) and a maximum follow-up time of 175 months. Baseline creatinine levels were normal in 1039/1281 (81.1%) subjects, while grade 1 (G1) renal insufficiency was present in 221/1281 (17.3%) prior to PRRT. G2 was present in 19/1281 (1.5%), and G3 in 2/1281 (0.2%). After treatment, the proportion of G3/G4 grade patients only increased from 0.2% to 0.7%. Mean creatinine levels increased from a baseline of 0.90 ± 0.30 to 1.01 ± 0.57 mg/L (80.0 ± 26.7 to 89.4 ± 50.8 µmol/L) after treatment. In our main analysis cohort of 1244 patients (4576 cycles), 200 patients experienced an increase in CTCAE creatinine grade. Age, number of treatment cycles, type of radionuclides, and length of follow-up time were the main factors affecting CTCAE creatinine grading after treatment. When comparing the subgroups treated with different radionuclides, the risk of nephrotoxicity after 90Y treatment alone and the 90Y/177Lu combination group was higher than after 177Lu treatment alone. In the 90Y treatment subgroup, the two significant risk factors for an increased CTCAE creatinine grade were identified to be age (≥60) and a long follow-up time. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation in a large cohort of 1281 NEN patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT co-administered with renal protection, treated through the individualized approach at a single institution over 18 years, did not reveal any evidence of long-term PRRT-related renal toxicity. The results of our study suggest that with the use of proper renal protection, nephrotoxicity due to PRRT is more likely a myth than a reality.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Is Effective for Clinical Control of Symptomatic Metastatic Insulinoma: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis.

Metastatic insulinoma is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor characterized by inappropriate insulin secretion, resulting in life-threatening hypoglycemia, which is often difficult to treat. There is currently very limited information about the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for clinical control of hypoglycemia. The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PRRT for improving hypoglycemia, to evaluate the change of medication after PRRT, and to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic malignant insulinoma and at least 2 cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC therapy from early 2000 to early 2022. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to quantify the severity and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes under background antihypoglycemic therapy (somatostatin analog, diazoxide, everolimus, corticosteroids): score 0, no hypoglycemic episodes; score 1, hypoglycemic events requiring additional conservative treatment with optimization of nutrition; score 2, severe hypoglycemia necessitating hospitalization and combined medication or history of hypoglycemic coma. Hypoglycemic score before and after PRRT was analyzed. Time of benefit was defined as a time range of fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the observation period than at baseline. Information on antihypoglycemic medication before and after therapy, PFS, and OS was recorded. Results: Twenty-six of 32 patients with a total of 106 [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC cycles were included. The average observation period was 21.5 mo (range, 2.3-107.4 mo). Before therapy, 81% (n = 21) of the patients had a hypoglycemia score of 2 and 19% (n = 5) had a score of 1. After PRRT, 81% of patients (n = 21) had a decreased score, and the remaining 5 patients showed a stable situation. There was temporary worsening of hypoglycemia just after injection of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in 19% of patients. The average time of benefit in the observation period was 17.2 mo (range, 0-70.2 mo). Antihypoglycemic medication reduction was achieved in 58% (n = 15) of patients. The median OS and PFS after the start of PRRT were 19.7 mo (95% CI, 6.5-32.9 mo) and 11.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-18.5 mo), respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study included the largest cohort of patients with malignant insulinoma to be evaluated. Long-lasting symptom control and reduction of antihypoglycemic medications were shown in most patients after late-line PRRT.

Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA).

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS: After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Extended peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: evaluating nephrotoxicity and therapeutic effectiveness in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving more than four treatment cycles.

PURPOSE: Currently, the most used peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) regimen for neuroendocrine tumors comprises 4 treatment cycles, and there is not enough large-scale data to support the safety of more individualized extended PRRT. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and potential nephrotoxicity related to PRRT using more than four treatment cycles. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who had received at least four PRRT cycles and had available follow-up data. We analyzed renal function indicators before and after multiple treatments, comparing nephrotoxicity in patients receiving four cycles ("standard") with those receiving more than four ("extended treatment"). Nephrotoxicity was assessed via creatinine levels and CTCAE creatinine grades. Treatment effectiveness was gauged using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, focusing on overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM), R 4.2.3, and GraphPad Prism 9.0.0. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 281 patients in the standard group and 356 in the extended treatment group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics or renal function were noted between the two groups pre-treatment. Mean post-treatment creatinine levels did not significantly differ between the standard (89.30 ± 51.19 µmol/L) and extended treatment groups (93.20 ± 55.98 µmol/L; P = 0.364). Similarly, there was no statistical significance between the CTCAE creatinine grades of the two groups (P = 0.448). Adverse renal events were observed in 0.4% of patients in the standard group and 1.1% in the extended treatment group. After a median follow-up time of 88.3 months, we found that median overall survival was significantly higher in the extended treatment group (72.8 months) compared to the standard treatment group (52.8 months). A Cox regression analysis further supported these findings, indicating a better prognosis for the extended treatment group in terms of overall survival (HR: 0.580, P < 0.001) and DSS (HR: 0.599, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that extending PRRT treatment beyond the standard four cycles may be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for NET patients. This approach could be particularly beneficial for patients experiencing disease recurrence or progression following standard treatment.

Effect of octreotide on oxidative stress in the erythrocyte and kidney tissue in adriamycin-induced experimental nephrotic syndrome model.

INTRODUCTION: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the reasons of end-stage kidney disease, and elucidating the pathogenesis and offer new treatment options is important. Oxidative stress might trigger pathogenesis systemically or isolated in the kidneys. Octreotide (OCT) has beneficial antioxidant effects. We aimed to investigate the source of oxidative stress and the effect of OCT on experimental NS model. METHODS: Twenty-four non-uremic Wistar albino rats were divided into 3 groups. Control group, 2 mL saline intramuscular (im); NS group, adriamycin 5 mg/kg intravenous (iv); NS treatment group, adriamycin 5 mg/kg (iv) and OCT 200 mcg/kg (im) were administered at baseline (Day 0). At the end of 21 days, creatinine and protein levels were measured in 24-hour urine samples. Erythrocyte and renal catalase (CAT) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) were measured. Renal histology was also evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the 3 groups in terms of CAT and TBARS in erythrocytes. Renal CAT level was lowest in NS group, and significantly lower than the control group. In treatment group, CAT level significantly increased compared with NS group. In terms of renal histology, tubular and interstitial evaluations were similar in all groups. Glomerular score was significantly higher in NS group compared with control group and it was significantly decreased in treatment group compared to NS group. CONCLUSIONS: Oxidative stress in NS might be due to the decrease in antioxidant protection mechanism in kidney. Octreotide improves antioxidant levels and histology in renal tissue and might be a treatment option.

Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Lutetium (Lu)-177 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is one of the standard treatments for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, limited Asian representation in the pivotal NETTER-1 trial and a lack of real-world data for Lu-177 PRRT from Asian regions exist. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu-177 PRRT in Korean patients with advanced NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 64 patients treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between November 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 55 years. Prior to PRRT, patients received a median of two lines (range 0-6) of systemic therapy. Fifty (78%) patients received the planned four cycles of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT. The median PFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval 16.7-not available) and the ORR was 20%. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 1.0-39.3), the median OS was not reached and the 1-year OS rate was 88%. The median PFS was better in patients with grade 1-2 NETs than in those with grade 3 NET (not reached vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio 3.15; p = 0.0058). Hematological toxicities were the common adverse events, including grade ≥ 3 anemia (7.8%), neutropenia (10.9%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In Korean patients with advanced NETs, Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT showed efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with those in the NETTER-1 trial and previous Western real-world studies.

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours.

PURPOSE: We present the results of an open-label, phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in 40 patients with previously treated, progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), in which dosimetry was used to guide maximum administered activity. METHODS: This study was conducted in two parts. Part A consisted of 15 patients who completed three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan at a fixed administered activity and peptide amount per cycle (4.5 GBq/300 µg). Part B, which included 25 patients who received one to five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, evaluated different administered activities (4.5 or 6.0 GBq/cycle) and peptide amounts (300, 700, or 1300 µg/cycle), limited to a cumulative absorbed radiation dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys and 1.5 Gy to the bone marrow. RESULTS: Median cumulative administered activity of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan was 13.0 GBq over three cycles (13.1 GBq in part A and 12.9 GBq in part B). Overall, 17 (42.5%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment­related adverse events; the most common were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Two patients developed myeloid neoplasms considered treatment related by the investigator. Disease control rate for part A and part B was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-99.4), and overall response rate was 21.1% (95% CI: 9.6-37.3). CONCLUSION: [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three cycles, has an acceptable safety profile with a promising clinical response in patients with progressive, SSTR-positive NETs. A 5-year long-term follow-up study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

A radiomic- and dosiomic-based machine learning regression model for pretreatment planning in 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy.

BACKGROUND: Standardized patient-specific pretreatment dosimetry planning is mandatory in the modern era of nuclear molecular radiotherapy, which may eventually lead to improvements in the final therapeutic outcome. Only a comprehensive definition of a dosage therapeutic window encompassing the range of absorbed doses, that is, helpful without being detrimental can lead to therapy individualization and improved outcomes. As a result, setting absorbed dose safety limits for organs at risk (OARs) requires knowledge of the absorbed dose-effect relationship. Data sets of consistent and reliable inter-center dosimetry findings are required to characterize this relationship. PURPOSE: We developed and standardized a new pretreatment planning model consisting of a predictive dosimetry procedure for OARs in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera). In the retrospective study described herein, we used machine learning (ML) regression algorithms to predict absorbed doses in OARs by exploiting a combination of radiomic and dosiomic features extracted from patients' imaging data. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment data for 20 patients with NETs treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE were collected from two clinical centers. A total of 3412 radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted from the patients' computed tomography (CT) scans and dose maps, respectively. All dose maps were generated using Monte Carlo simulations. An ML regression model was designed based on ML algorithms for predicting the absorbed dose in every OAR (liver, left kidney, right kidney, and spleen) before and after the therapy and between each therapy session, thus predicting any possible radiotoxic effects. RESULTS: We evaluated nine ML regression algorithms. Our predictive model achieved a mean absolute dose error (MAE, in Gy) of 0.61 for the liver, 1.58 for the spleen, 1.30 for the left kidney, and 1.35 for the right kidney between pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single photon emission (SPECT)/CT scans. Τhe best predictive performance observed was based on the gradient boost for the liver, the left kidney and the right kidney, and on the extra tree regressor for the spleen. Evaluation of the model's performance according to its ability to predict the absorbed dose in each OAR in every possible combination of pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and any posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycle SPECT/CT scans as well as any 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle and the consequent 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle revealed mean absorbed dose differences ranges from -0.55 to 0.68 Gy. Incorporating radiodosiomics features from the 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and first 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle scans further improved the precision and minimized the standard deviation of the predictions in nine out of 12 instances. An average improvement of 57.34% was observed (range: 17.53%-96.12%). However, it's important to note that in three instances (i.e., Ga,C.1 â†’ C3 in spleen and left kidney, and Ga,C.1 â†’ C2 in right kidney) we did not observe an improvement (absolute differences of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.05 Gy, respectively). Wavelet-based features proved to have high correlated predictive value, whereas non-linear-based ML regression algorithms proved to be more capable than the linear-based of producing precise prediction in our case. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radiomics and dosiomics has potential utility for personalized molecular radiotherapy (PMR) response evaluation and OAR dose prediction. These radiodosiomic features can potentially provide information on any possible disease recurrence and may be highly useful in clinical decision-making, especially regarding dose escalation issues.

Impact of octreotide on sodium level in cirrhotic inpatients with hyponatremia: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Octreotide could increase serum sodium in cirrhotics with hyponatremia by counteracting splanchnic vasodilation. Current supporting data is limited to case reports and series. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of octreotide on serum sodium in cirrhotic inpatients with hyponatremia compared with controls. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including adult inpatients with cirrhosis, admitted for ≥5 days with Na <133 at baseline. We excluded those receiving other vasoconstrictor infusions, hypertonic saline, tolvaptan or dialysis. Controls represented an equal number of inpatients with cirrhosis not receiving octreotide. Sodium changes on days 5, 7 and 10 were evaluated with multivariable adjustment. RESULTS: Each group consisted of 156 patients. The octreotide subjects had more cirrhosis complications. Baseline sodium was lower in the octreotide group, and their change in sodium at day 5 was higher (6.6 ± 5.6 vs. 3.5 ± 5.3; P < 0.001). Significant differences were also noted on days 7 and 10 (7.84 ± 6.76 vs. 4.33 ± 6.2 and 7.99 ± 6.72 vs. 5.2 ± 6.56, respectively). The impact of octreotide was lessened but remained significant ( P = 0.019) in a mixed model adjusting for baseline sodium, creatinine, requirement of paracentesis, midodrine, albumin and fresh frozen plasma. More octreotide patients achieved hyponatremia resolution (55.1% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.031), but significance was not preserved in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Octreotide administration is associated with an increase in serum sodium among inpatient cirrhotics with hyponatremia, even after accounting for confounders. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Impact of Single-Time-Point Estimates of 177Lu-PRRT Absorbed Doses on Patient Management: Validation of a Trained Multiple-Linear-Regression Model in 159 Patients and 477 Therapy Cycles.

Dosimetry after 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) enables estimation of radiation doses absorbed by normal organs and target lesions. This process is time-consuming and requires multiple posttreatment studies on several subsequent days. In a previous study, we described a newly developed multiple-linear-regression model to predict absorbed doses (ADs) from a single-time-point (STP) posttreatment study acquired 168 h after the first infusion and 24 h after the following ones, with similar results to the standard multiple-time-point (MTP) protocol. The present study aimed to validate this model in a large patient cohort and to assess whether STP dosimetry affects patient management decisions compared with our MTP protocol. Methods: Quantitative 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT post-PRRT data from 159 consecutive patients (172 therapies, 477 therapy cycles) were retrospectively analyzed. ADs obtained from an STP model were compared with those obtained using an MTP model. We evaluated the impact of the STP model on the decision on whether PRRT should be stopped because of an expected kidney AD exceeding the safety threshold. We hypothesized that patient management based on the STP model does not differ from that based on the MTP model in at least 90% of the cases. Results: There was no difference in management decisions between the MTP and STP models in 170 of 172 therapies (98.8%). A Fisher χ2 test for combined probabilities produced a composite P value of 0.0003. Mean cumulative AD relative differences between the STP and MTP models were 0.8% ± 8.0%, -7.7% ± 4.8%, 0.0% ± 11.4%, -2.8% ± 6.3%, and -2.1% ± 18.4% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors, respectively (Pearson r = 0.99 for all), for patients who underwent 4 therapy cycles. Similar results were obtained with fewer therapy cycles. Conclusion: Estimated radiation ADs and patient management decisions were similar with the STP and MTP models. The STP model can simplify the dosimetry process while also reducing scanner and staff time and improving patient comfort.

MPOWERED Trial Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety Data for Oral Octreotide Capsules in Acromegaly.

CONTEXT: The MPOWERED core trial (NCT02685709) and open-label extension (OLE) phase investigated long-term efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly. Core trial primary endpoint data demonstrated noninferiority to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs). Core trial completers were invited to participate in the OLE phase. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term efficacy and safety of OOC in patients with acromegaly who previously responded to and tolerated both OOC and injectable octreotide/lanreotide and completed the core phase. METHODS: The unique study design of transitioning between OOC and iSRLs allowed within-patient evaluations. The proportion of biochemical responders (insulin-like growth factor I < 1.3 × upper limit of normal) at end of each extension year who entered that year as responders was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: At year 1 extension end, 52/58 patients from both the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups were responders (89.7%; 95% CI 78.8-96.1), 36/41 (87.8%; 95% CI 73.8-95.9) in year 2, and 29/31 (93.5%; 95% CI 78.6-99.2) in year 3. No new or unexpected safety signals were detected; 1 patient withdrew owing to treatment failure. Patients who transitioned from iSRLs in the core trial to OOC in the OLE phase reported improved treatment convenience/satisfaction and symptom control. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcome data support for the first time that transitioning patients randomized to iSRL (who previously responded to both OOC and iSRLs) back to OOC had a significant effect on patients' symptoms score in a prospective cohort. The MPOWERED OLE showed long-term maintenance of response and sustained safety with OOC.

Specific Uptake in the Bone Marrow Causes High Absorbed Red Marrow Doses During [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment.

Bone marrow suppression is a common side effect after [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms share expression of somatostatin receptor type 2 with CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells, potentially leading to active uptake in the radiosensitive red marrow region where these cells are located. This study aimed to identify and quantify specific red marrow uptake using SPECT/CT images collected after the first treatment cycle. Methods: Seventeen patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms were treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. Seven of them had confirmed bone metastases. After the first treatment cycle, each patient went through 4 SPECT/CT imaging sessions 4, 24, 48, and 168 h after administration. Monte Carlo-based reconstructions were used to quantify activity concentrations in tumors and multiple skeletal sites presumed to house red marrow: the T9-L5 vertebrae and the ilium portion of the hip bones. The activity concentration from the descending aorta was used as input in a compartment model intended to establish a pure red marrow biodistribution by separating the nonspecific blood-based contribution from the specific activity concentration in red marrow. The biodistributions from the compartment model were used to perform red marrow dosimetry at each skeletal site. Results: Increased uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE was observed in the T9-L5 vertebrae and hip bones in all 17 patients compared with activity concentrations in the aorta. The mean specific red marrow uptake was 49% (range, 0%-93%) higher than the nonspecific uptake. The median (±SD) total absorbed dose to the red marrow was 0.056 ± 0.023 Gy/GBq and 0.043 ± 0.022 Gy/GBq for the mean of all vertebrae and hip bones, respectively. The patients with bone metastases had an absorbed dose of 0.085 ± 0.046 Gy/GBq and 0.069 ± 0.033 Gy/GBq for the vertebrae and hip bones, respectively. The red marrow elimination phase was statistically slower in patients with fast tumor elimination, which is in line with transferrin transport of 177Lu back to the red marrow. Conclusion: Our results suggest that specific red marrow uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is in line with observations of somatostatin receptor type 2-expressing hematopoietic progenitor cells within the bone marrow. Blood-based dosimetry methods fail to account for the prolonged elimination of specific uptake and underestimate the absorbed dose to red marrow.

An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Frequent somatostatin receptor PET, for example, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET, is part of the diagnostic work-up of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), resulting in high accumulated radiation doses. Scan-related radiation exposure should be minimized in accordance with the as-low-as-reasonably achievable principle, for example, by reducing injected radiotracer activity. Previous investigations found that reducing 64Cu-DOTATATE activity to below 50 MBq results in inadequate image quality and lesion detection. We therefore investigated whether image quality and lesion detection of less than 50 MBq of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET could be restored using artificial intelligence (AI). Methods: We implemented a parameter-transferred Wasserstein generative adversarial network for patients with NENs on simulated low-dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET images corresponding to 25% (PET25%), or about 48 MBq, of the injected activity of the reference full dose (PET100%), or about 191 MBq, to generate denoised PET images (PETAI). We included 38 patients in the training sets for network optimization. We analyzed PET intensity correlation, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and mean-square error (MSE) of PETAI/PET100% versus PET25%/PET100% Two readers assessed Likert scale-defined image quality (1, very poor; 2, poor; 3, moderate; 4, good; 5, excellent) and identified lesion-suspicious foci on PETAI and PET100% in a subset of the patients with no more than 20 lesions per organ (n = 33) to allow comparison of all foci on a 1:1 basis. Detected foci were scored (C1, definite lesion; C0, lesion-suspicious focus) and matched with PET100% as the reference. True-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) lesions were assessed. Results: For PETAI/PET100% versus PET25%/PET100%, PET intensity correlation had a goodness-of-fit value of 0.94 versus 0.81, PSNR was 58.1 versus 53.0, SSIM was 0.908 versus 0.899, and MSE was 2.6 versus 4.7. Likert scale-defined image quality was rated good or excellent in 33 of 33 and 32 of 33 patients on PET100% and PETAI, respectively. Total number of detected lesions was 118 on PET100% and 115 on PETAI Only 78 PETAI lesions were TP, 40 were FN, and 37 were FP, yielding detection sensitivity (TP/(TP+FN)) and a false discovery rate (FP/(TP+FP)) of 66% (78/118) and 32% (37/115), respectively. In 62% (23/37) of cases, the FP lesion was scored C1, suggesting a definite lesion. Conclusion: PETAI improved visual similarity with PET100% compared with PET25%, and PETAI and PET100% had similar Likert scale-defined image quality. However, lesion detection analysis performed by physicians showed high proportions of FP and FN lesions on PETAI, highlighting the need for clinical validation of AI algorithms.

Safety and Efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients With Extensive Bone Disease.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and extensive bone metastases, that is, more than 50% of the skeleton involved. METHOD: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed in 30 patients (13 women and 17 men, mean age, 60 years; range, 35-77 years) undergoing 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Patients had progressive metastatic NETs with extensive skeletal metastases (>50% skeletal involvement seen on baseline 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT). The average administered activity was 7.308 (SD, 0.02) GBq per cycle with average treatment interval of 15 weeks. Survival analyses (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival), radiological response assessment, toxicity assessment, and health-related quality of life (QoL) was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 26 patients completed 4 cycles, and 4 patients had less than 4 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE. One patient (3%) did not complete treatment because of hematological toxicity. The estimated median PFS and median overall survival were calculated at 27 and 35 months, respectively. End-of-treatment radiological assessment showed partial response in 5 patients (17%), stable disease in 20 patients (66%), and radiological progressive disease in 3 patients (10%). Clinical progression was seen in a further 2 patients (7%).The incidence of grade 3/4 bone marrow toxicity was 10%. No patient had grade 3/4 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-related nephrotoxicity. There was overall improvement in global QoL score (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Gastrointestinal NET-21) ( P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: 177 Lu-DOTATATE seems to have satisfactory therapeutic outcome in patients with advanced metastatic NET with extensive bone disease, with reasonable PFS and significant improvement in the global health-related QoL. The bone marrow toxicity was within the accepted range. Increasing the interval between cycles does not seem to reduce efficacy and may reduce toxicity, ensuring the bone marrow has sufficient time to recover between cycles.